Politics, Industry and pollution

From The desk of: Rosemarie Dundon
Date: November 15, 2010

ON The issues regarding climate change, pollution and industry:

Ladies and Gentlemen:

My suggestion is to change the processes with which we dispose of wastes; this is of course not a new idea in principle...

Question: How else will we dispose of the toxins and emitions that are hazardous to our well
being? Namely, emitions should be filtered, captured and disposed of.

WHAT? I believe that we are not about to stop the ways we manufacture,but we can change the way we dispose of wastes. I write to directly introduce a starting point idea. Our manufacturing does not necessarily have the change today; how we pollute the environment does need to be adaptable.


Simple is best? Since our world economy is dependent on manufacturing and it's processes,'
we need to move toward conservation, responsible disposal of emitions and address the effects on our environment.

Filtration and disposal are more likely to be accepted as modes of operations; these would not interfere with the manufacturing, instead, what is being offered: a new process which is seeking a responsible manufacturing that contributes to clean air and less harmful emitions.

Let's shelve the idea in principle that we are going to STOP emitions completely for now. Instead, let's circumvent the processes' that make emitions, pollution and bio-hazards.

Let's make filtration systems, what comes immediately to mind is filtering the toxins and wastes. Let's capture the pollutants, and dispose of these filtration filters that would “hold” the toxins.

i.e.Automobiles:
Idea: Trap and dispose of emitions as solid waste.
Just make a “Sock” which would cover the tailpipe, filter the emitions and change the filter often.

The word “Sock” is used deliberately, because you take your socks on and off. You change them when their dirty, right?

WHAT?

Other ancillary ideas:

Next Question:

If each factory, eliminated their emitions of toxins, or lowered them with filtration, how much better off would the world be?

Simple is best, is it not?

The first idea is: How much easier it would be if we created either an antidote for or a filtration system for, (or optimally for both), to trap these emitions /toxins and chemicals?


WHAT? I hope I have the facts correct. Is it not true that EVERY item on the Periodic Table of Elements has an anti-dote?

This is the First idea or first phase:
On that principle,why have we not “cured” pollution by using chemical antidotes to each element?

Why, if the former is not possible, why cant
we “TRAP” THE EMITIONS, WITH A SPECIFICALLY FORMULATED “ANTI-DOTE” DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED, OR DEVELOP A FILTRATION SYSTEM THAT RENDERS THE TOXINS CAPTURED AND DISPOSABLE.

Next Question:
Why, if we cannot find the antidote, why cant we
simply develop a filter that will trap the toxins and figure out how to dispose of these dirty filters as a
solid waste management feature?

WHAT? Ideas in sum:

1)Develop a antidote, and reverse the chemical makeup of each particular toxin, emition or hazard.
2)Develop a filtration system to trap air toxins,
and dispose of same as a solid waste an easier thing to dispose of?
3)Develop a filtration system for each toxin,
create the antidote to the toxin; dispose of the filter as solid waste.

Again, further, on the principle on the Periodic Table of Elements, I understand that each element has an antidote. Therefore, I submit the following ideas.

Other applicable General Concepts on Pollution:
Pollution, can we not add vitamins to our water supply? I understand that fluoride, in large dosages is a cancer causing agent. We use it to help keep our water clean now.

We need clean safe and healthy water. Why not introduce vitamins into our water supply for general health advocacy?

Basic Concept Extrapolations:
Can we not reverse or “Cure” polluted water with the same idea discussed earlier ? ~ Reverse pollution by reversing the elements in the water that are harmful.

WHAT? Make our water supply clean and healthy.
Or not.

Campaigne finance reform

From the desk of: Rosemarie C. Dundon
November 11, 2010
Page 1 of 3 ~
A WORD ON CAMPAIGNE FINANCE REFORM

In fairness to all who aspire to elected office, let no one be disadvantaged by finances, instead let he/she be disadvantaged by their issues, ideas and basic philosophy.
Let those who best understand American Values win!

HOW? Remember FDR rode into city by city, making his platform and rhetoric known? He pulled up on the train route, made his speeches and went onto the next town. The key item in an election is exposure.

Well,ok, but today we have media and a lot of money invested in each candidate. So? How do we level the playing field, make everyone running for office (be) heard, and how do we make sure it is fair to each candidate, their constituents and society as whole?

Campaigne Finance Reform:

Cooperation is needed from all involved; the candidate, the constituents and media.
Page 2 of 3 ~.

What? Make no further personal campaigne finance contributions. Instead, initially as the race begins, make all contributions equally shared by all who are running for office. At the end you would make the bulk of money go back to the winning party-candidate. Make no mistake, each candidate will be heard, the general party platform will be be established for the coming election,and no one will lose because he/she could not finance their campaigne.

Instead of a candidate running for office, it should be that he/she best represents the party, the people and country.

HOW? All donations are to pay for air time/media/press for all candidates; until such time as the party candidate is chosen.

At that end of the campaigne cycle we will have heard from everyone, we will have made our decision, and we will have a party-candidate we totally support.

For example: the democratic party would fund all ads for the party;the candidates will get equal time providing a few loose ends are eliminated.


Page 3 of 3 ~
How then will begin traveling town to town is: Everyone will be heard! Point two: the approach to any election should be based on party-variables.

Town to Town debates can take place and be distributed worldwide candidate by candidate. The entire approach toward elected office would be: A narrowing down of our idea of a candidate for elected office.Our basic value system will be established.

Debates can naturally take place and take on a process of elimination; in other words: Each candidate will debate with all the others, because the party-itself will pay the expenses.
That is not to say that media should not have to front some of the costs. Politics is news.

Air time for a debate is prime time for advertising. Therefore, media should be mandated to fund telecasts to some extent.

WHAT? Just the latest from a girl from Queens.

QUERY IN THE BLOGOSPHERE~

 

                                    

March 15, 2010, Eight PM

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

Greetings! The following is query toward publication of my collective works; the lines below are from my work called: "Serendipity" which I am promoting here. For your information, Serendipity is one of two of my narratives. Additionally I have a book in development; I also have a substantial Collection of poems and Song poems in flux.

 

For instance, in abbreviated form, (forty lines only), "poetry.com" has a small collection of my poems. Search "Rosemarie (Columban) Dundon" if you wish. (The poems there are formatted to fit a forty-line dialogue box).

 

Actually Google, (my name) and you'll get a wide variety of good reading!

 

Hence, at long last, I submit my query. I Thank you! for your time, attention to detail and industry circumspect. For your information, my resume, bio and standard cover letter are also attached for your perusal.

 

Let me include a synopsis: It is thus~The discourse in this narrative is three things:

1)The development of a Moral Compass, Personal Philosophy and view

2)The coming of age, or "Passing of the Torch," and

3)The Examined life. The point comes clear that one should not take it lightly that they must earn their place at "the adults table."  It asks: Are we too free? Our position in the cosmos is also a reverie here.

 

The speakers are: God Himself, Omnipotent, all Powerful, and Lugh:  Who was once thought to be "The presiding deity of all human knowledge and all artistic and medicinal skill," a Young Lass, Deirdre, Her beau, Tom, and Her Grandma, "Nanny."

 

 

 

Development:

Early on Deirdre gets rid of her muse, and substitutes that relationship with one in kind, one to her maker.  Like shedding skin, fledgling like, she attempts to understand "The Flower of One's Age," They develop a thesis.

 

Exchange: A discourse it attempted to discuss what is commonly understood about dating, theology, philosophy, relationships, what is right and wrong, and our relationship with our maker.

 

"The Elephant in the room": The idea of the exercise of free will and the free will concept leave her bereft. We discuss the progression of time and what a person's life is and isn't; we discuss what one calls knowledge today and what was once "Fact." A sense of the mission in life, and finding it, are related, debated and enumerated.

 

Progression:

A gypsy appears at an opportune moment and gives a reading without a fee, to deliver a message "from beyond here." She recommends that the couple take a trip "mountain climbing," and soon they are at the precipice, in search of a "love of the unselfish kind."

 

Precipice:

They reach a plateau and an understanding of love, life and liberty. Nanny breaks up the momentum before much can transpire. Once home again, their discourse picks up and they decide to "marry and not tarry." Toward the end, there is a progression toward old age implied. First, Deirdre wants more information on what is, what should be and what to do. Nanny offers her best allegories... Nanny dies, and it is recognized "how fragile, temporal and insignificant are we..." (This would easily be a trilogy. I have a skewed second narrative which is still in development, called: "Eudora and friends)."

 

Their resolve~

The joys of life and death as a harsh reality are without retort, and they decide to live the best that they see fit and to the extent that they are able.

 

You might be better served with actual excerpts which may suit you best. I am not a good salesperson. (You would know that if you've read my resume...)

 

The first and last words belong to God, Omnipotent…

God closes with, "       I am not a myth, and I will reach them how I please; whether it is through you or "The First Mover"[1] question, or some newly found information.

            Some of these same great thinkers perhaps think not that I may only want a dialogue between the scientists and the believers.  In my time, I reveal all I want to be known. [2]

 

As an aside, One's perspective is imperishable, and style 'tis original firstly, and best of all, all we have are ourselves discovering a world of endless learning. Perhaps my views are dated, but they are authentic, effective and reasonably interesting, I understand. My bio and resume are attached to this communiqué.

 

Thank you for your critique.

 

God Speed.

Rosemarie

 

In case you're still interested, the narrative begins thus:

 

God:                Ah, a gathering of all the "must see people;" the bright and the beautiful ones, the haves, the capitalists, the gabbers, and the other halves; it's a dinner and a dance a chance for love and romance.

                        It may take an entire lifetime for most to learn that there are loves and then there are other friends whom stay far beyond the reaches of youth, earthly beauty and this lifetime; they awaken each other to all life has to offer; they offer constancy, goodness, fruitfulness and peace. Seek the beauty within first, but do not be blind to what I have made, be it comeliness or intellect or both.

                         Leave your purpose to me, and just "Come back the way you left"[3], complete, an angel of heaven, equipped with all he needs to overcome the darkness of the world of man; you will age, and return to me whither you choose to or not. In the end, even if you have denied and defied me in life, you will come back as either my child or my adversary. Remember that the head is the portal of the soul; do not defile either.

                        Disobey me all your earthly years, but when I say, "Come," you will;[4] enjoy your dancing years, and when wisdom and age have come, whether they arrive together or not, advise and guide the younger; tell them they should "…not to be enslaved to the body and the appetites,"[5] like you have already been warned, because you know quite well you will shed the body and go on our way to paradise or some other station elsewhere.

                        Considering yourself always on "stand-by" to a flight to heaven, to the throne of God, you must live each day as if it were your last to the best of your ability. Cherish each other, all, because there are no disposable persons. Always in your life be as a small child,[6] curious and inquisitive, speculative, hopeful, but never combative, cruel or mischievous. Above all, cast away any arrogance, no matter your learning or experience; conceit[7] is treachery and a pathway beyond hubris, and eventually, your own early demise. Do not come to me too soon, because of your own folly, instead come when I am ready, when all I sent you for is accomplished. Walk with all your ancestors in tow.

 

I know in the least you are amused. It would be great to hear from you if you were to request the rest of the manuscript. In any case, I thank you

again for your attention, focus and industry.

 

Yours truly,

Rosemarie Columban Dundon

E: ballyvalleygirl1@verizon.net.

 

 

 

A FRIEND OR A FEIND? I POSE THE QUESTION!

Dear Friend:

Friends are allowed to speak freely. I don't want any relationship that is not based on communiqué, respect and honesty. My only reservation is I went and wrote what I should have spoken already, in passing, in conversation.

I cringe at the idea that you will tell me how inadequate I am, but that's your job, because friends do that kind of thing all the time.

These are some thoughts I've had about friends. A poem I wrote years ago…

Friends are like cheerleaders and traffic cops, on one 
hand, they don't shut up for you, and the other never 
stop shutting up for you. A friend's ears and mouth 
are like revolving doors and safety vaults, never at 
fault. 
Friends know when to stay out of the way. 
Friends know what to and not to say. 
Friends are like trees, their roots firmly planted. 
Friends will never leave you empty handed. 
Friends provide kindness when they can even when it 
leaves them branded. 
Friends are absent when needed, should be heeded when 
needed and state the truth rather than leave you 
robbed of reality. This too, tells you what you mean 
to them, you see?? 
Friends are those who know they don't need an 
invitation, and friends are those who help you face 
the nation, initiations, gyrations, machinations, joys, sorrows, 
and happy days; in many ways, friends are those who 
will be the last to say "Goodbye" and the first to 
say, "Get out." 
Friends can be gentle, friends can be tough, friends 
can be factual, and that can be rough. 
The best thing about friends is that that can be. 
(LIKE YOU) 
Love, 
Rosemarie 

So, are you or are you NOT my friend?

It's not clear to me, and it makes me angry that I am insulted by your lack of remarks on the fact, the truth and the Lore.

 
 

Dear Greg:  "Dear Greg" is that the same as friend?

I would not bother to write if I thought you unworthy of my time. Most would be on the defensive and never see you again; after your remarks about NOT being my boyfriend; that's" the poll" of the Rosemarie's BUD's Crew.

I do not seek fulfillment in any person, because it comes from within. I am a thinking feeling and caring person, indignant to your remarks, shocked that it sometimes seems you have no rewarding relations to me, and you have all your cards, and that is a problem.

Anyone, including you can be too safe, too stifled and too restrained.